is jackson casino under the workers union

They found a champion in Indiana Republican Todd Rokita.

Since then, gambling interests have appealed to Congress to overturn that decision. But in a 2004 case involving the San Manuel Indian Bingo and Casino in Southern California, the NLRB determined that the Act can apply to tribe-owned enterprises under some circumstances, like when it’s a commercial enterprise that employs non-Native Americans and caters to non-Native American customers.

Until 2004, the NLRB interpreted the Act to say that it had no jurisdiction over employers on tribal land. The controversy arises from the fact that when the National Labor Relations Act was passed in 1935 spelling out federally protected union rights, it specifically exempted state, local and federal government employees, but said nothing about tribal government employees. The AFL-CIO supports the principle of sovereignty for tribal governments, but does not believe that employers should use this principle to deny workers their collective bargaining rights and freedom of association.” - AFL-CIO government affairs director Bill SamuelThe bill aims to overturn a 2004 decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in which the agency ruled that tribe-owned enterprises are subject to the National Labor Relations Act if they’re similar in nature to other commercial enter- prises and aren’t providing core government functions. The Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act would impact not just casinos, but mines, power plants, smoke shops, saw mills, construction companies, ski resorts, hotels, spas, and high-tech firms - any commercial enterprise owned by federally recognized tribes. A bill in Congress that passed the House of Representatives in January would eliminate federally protected union rights for an estimated 600,000 workers in Indian tribal enterprises.

Is jackson casino under the workers union